I'm back with some common sense to help those who are against this exclusivity thing. It's crystal clear that making an actress exclusive is just plain bad and really SUCKS for us users. There's no denying it, and I'd say the same myself. There's no need to keep spamming the same OFF-Topic phrase over and over.
Here's the thing, they're not here to conduct a poll to see if you agree with making a girl exclusive, nor are they seeking anyone's blessing. No, the fact that they've created this thread solely to ask for suggestions means they've already made up their minds and are all set to go exclusive in the future.
doublevr said: "normally exclusivity means 10 scenes a year or so at some rate around $3-4k/scene onwards. There's a logic signing rising star and having her exclusive for a year or two...It doesn't make sense to get on exclusive someone with plenty of scenes already."
From their perspective, who stands to gain from this feature? Well, it's the site, especially if they make a wise choice. Imagine if they pick a fresh-faced starlet who's never ventured into the VR but has already made a name in the world of flat scenes. Lock her in with a contract for a year or two, and what do you get? They'll simply attract all her fans and those craving to see her. Heck, they might even tempt some flat-porn folks to give VR a whirl for the first time. More subscribers, more moolah. I've been there, I've been attracted in a similar way, it's how I got introduced to Wankz back in the day, only to get some Gina Valentina and Alex Blake cuz I couldn't find them nowhere else.
And let's not forget the second winner in this equation, the girl herself. She can kick back, relax, and forget about the whole "what's tomorrow gonna bring" anxiety. No more worrying if there's work or not. So don't yall be that selfish for once.
