[deleted] who don't look like street prostitutes
There we go again. You might ask yourself whether it's your attitude that's non-standard
SLR Party Riots
SchnuppiLilac He's talking about ridiculously overdone fake breasts, lip injections, tattoed eybeows, 2 inch eyelashes, etc.
They look like streetwalkers. If you've ever picked one up, you'd know that that appearance is optimized to draw attention in a dark, distanced environment, and it looks awful close-up in the light (i.e.., in VR).
SchnuppiLilac Like it or not, streetwalkers are the lowest rung on the sex-worker food chain. I didn't sign up here to see models that you could round up sleeping at the bus station.
- Edited
Rustam1990 It seems it's getting a bit "Wankz-sy".
In other words:
taw·dry (adjective): showy but cheap and of poor quality.
ex: "tawdry jewelry"
Similar: gaudy, flashy, showy, garish, loud, tasteless, vulgar, brash
You were making art. Now it's just cheap, tawdry, 3D porn.
[deleted] Guess what dude, a lot of men like the kinda women you don't. Who would've thought, right? Also the name SexLikeReal has nothing to do with what kind of women are being cast, it's a reference to VR. You have some decent points about narrative building, but it's marred by your obvious bias.
Cool, I'll put all my complaints here:
Not having a separate advanced search feature for those who want it is crazy with the amount of content this site has. Seems like it was implemented a couple of years ago then removed. Not being able to say, search by two keywords while simultaneously SORTING those results is very limiting.
It's 2023, if you forced all your content creators to film in at least 5K or 6K if they wanted to sell you content they would do it. 4K doesn't cut it anymore.
There simply aren't enough tags. I'm not suggesting user added tags would be a good idea, but there would be no technical downside to just adding a larger variety of available tags. Just to give one of many examples, for instance, you have 'magic wand' but no way to find videos with regular vibrating sex toys, or suction toys. Those fall under the broad "toys/dildos" tag as it stands.
A minor feature I would use all the time: easily filtering out compilations, especially when I am searching by actress.
ItsForTheArticles Definitely agree with this one. when i'm searching for an individual actress i hate getting 30 search results only to find out there's like 5 actual full length videos in there and 25 compilations that she makes a 60 second appearance in.
- Edited
doublevr You or anybody else from SLR would not respond to my questions about what you said about production and ROI. I asked different places, different times with nothing. So I had to spend 2 hours looking up old statements by you to get you to respond. It looks like it finally worked.
Believe it or not, I believe that our criticism helps put SLR in the right direction. I'm not the only one wanting a 5 minute beginning. You had made statements in the past that you did too, then made a statement in the complete opposite direction.
The longer you just ignored my question the more frustrating it became. Because it made no sense to me. It still doesn't other than just wanting the money.
Thank you for finally answering the question. That is all I wanted. Just that somebody thinks beginnings are important, otherwise it's just the lowest common porn.
I will say it for the tenth time. All I want is GOOD quality vr porn with good scripts. You used to make same day scripts (by a human) with beautiful places and an amazing story. A lot of the scenes lately are not that. If you do that then I will say nothing but good things about SLR. Just like I did for 'Mile high club'. Sorry you don't like it but from my end, it doesn't feel like a me problem.
- Edited
Will65 In other words:
taw·dry (adjective): showy but cheap and of poor quality.
ex: "tawdry jewelry"
Similar: gaudy, flashy, showy, garish, loud, tasteless, vulgar, brashYou were making art. Now it's just cheap, tawdry, 3D porn.
More or less (wouldn;t use the word tawdry, but rather "less grand"). Used to have an annual sub at Wankz/MILFVR because they used to pump out really good sscenes with good actresses (Kali Roses, Gina Valentina being regulars) and good stories (Stepmom's Little Helper, the Easter/Xmas scenes, Downward Doggystyle, Circle of Wife, Bargain Banging...) Now most scenes are around 40-50 mins (as if they have some "limit"), rather vanilla without much innovation.
Similarly for SLRO, just getting the feeling that scenes are shorter lately, with 1 hr+ grand productions rarer and rarer (the most recent decent watchable FFM production being the Lexi Stone+Jill Kassidy scene, which by the way was good, the Mile High Club simply wasn't watchable for me). Is it because Nash is in Europe and other directors do not like to shoot long scenes? Good storylines are more and more sparse (with the exception of the Blake series). I know these are trends and hopefully do not reflect a real change in direction (e.g. pump out more shorter scenes in exchange for less longer grand productions)
Rustam1990 I try to tell them over and over that if you don't have a story then you just have porn. I can sub to any porn site for just porn. Any company can go hire two hot girls, put them in tons of makeup, maybe a maid outfit and off you go.
No need to say much of anything other than the usual porn lingo. Start with sitting, forward then back, then the big choice to really mix it up. Do you go standing next or laying down next. Pick standing first cause last scene you went laying first. Front then back, boom boom. Laying down boom boom.
Done, 45 minutes copy and paste.
I'm trying to tell them that anybody can do this cause everybody does do this. After scale and distance the only thing you can do to make your site better than the next is the STORY.
garblah It's 2023, if you forced all your content creators to film in at least 5K or 6K if they wanted to sell you content they would do it. 4K doesn't cut it anymore.
sir.. this is walmart. slr doesnt value quality, only quantity.
spacepirate that’s exactly what this thread is for. Let’s keep the rest of the forum free from it 
️
- Edited
spacepirate What would be different if we don't publish scenes you deem as low quality?
Not taking in to account that there are many users who prefer amateur scenes. Without platforms like SLR, these studios would not even have a chance to start up. shrinking the industry to even less high quality publications.
Or are you saying SLRO are low quality?
Absolutely. The upcoming Tru and Melissa scene is again at around the 50 min mark. It will still be an exciting scene to watch but I would have had higher hopes if it were 1h15m+.
Sure length of scene does not dictate quality of scene but for me longer scenes = more time to get to "bond" with the performers and a higher likelihood of a good story+buildup and a decent variety of sex (FF segments as well).
- Edited
Rakly3 It's 2023, and SLRO can't consistently nail lighting, angles, distance, scale, audio, editing, cutting the model's head off - most studios that have been around as long as you have sorted this out years ago. Does that sound like high quality to you? But instead of focusing on that - which we ask for all the time - you give us journeys, and shorts, and passthrough, and airplanes, while limiting downloads, streaming quality, and what player we can use.
