Rustam1990 If they made these types of scenes and put out a script to them within a week like they use to do then they would be back to their ways of 2 years ago.
SLR Party Riots
[deleted]
- Edited
catflap no need to change anything on my account
By and large, I am satisfied. Otherwise I wouldn't be renewing my membership. However, there are areas for improvement. 1. They'd certainly benefit from an 'apply here' button on the homepage for amateurs who might want to make a VR debut. 2. It's insane that they throw away much of the best content by doing publicity stills without a VR180 camera recording the action. 3. They could make better films by cutting the administration costs and paying the models a premium for exclusive activities (like they do at BackroomCastingCouch), and for finding newer and more conventionally attractive models.
rerun119 they are going to release that update, it's just not ready, they are simply testing the CGI backgrounds to see how good they look and what people think, once they release the update you will be able to swap these out or use passthrough, whichever you prefer and whatever your headset supports. It will be good.
metichemsi I meant removing the background on every video. So they don't have to film in front of a greenscreen.
metichemsi once they release the update you will be able to swap these out
I don't want to swap out the background. I want a real background they can remove for PT.
SLR said they are still working on it.
[deleted]
- Edited
I'd love to know the percentage of downvote on this. I joined reddit just to see, but they are censoring the percentages that they used to show 
@doublevr This is exactly why you need a new casting agent.
[deleted] they are censoring the percentages
Meta does the exact same censoring on my Q(Anon)2!!!1!!1! They don't want me to know the percentage of how empty my battery is. What are they trying to hide?
You also joined reddit to downvote that post 
If you have to really know it is 65-70% upvoted.
r/oculusnsfw popularity isn't the best gauge (to put it lightly), and there is always more to the story. For example - getting Connie's scene and our content in front of thousands of her fans, including a LOT of people who very likely aren't familiar with VR content.
- Edited
The perception and bias of select users on this thread is very telling. The condescension of the kink and model preferences shaming is straight up inappropriate. We each have different preferences and reasons to consume VR adult content. There are people like me who primarily consume content with vanilla models who have enhanced features like breasts, lips, and ass because it lets us escape into fantasy land. Likewise, there are other people who like to consume content with models who have the natural body type for their own reasons.
I don't understand why there is such an outcry from some users who are saying SLRO is leaning towards models with enhanced body parts or tattoos when the data says otherwise.
I wrote a bit of code to pull model attributes from freeones.com that have been featured in SLRO BG scenes released since the start of 2023. I excluded group SLRO scenes such as BGG, BGGG, since it will take a bit of time to code and only comprised of a few releases for the year. If we look at this objectively with the content rolled out since January 1 2023, over 70% of SLRO BG scenes exclusively features models with no breast enhancements. Freeones.com has some missing data points and models (data has NA or Unknown) but having a quick look at these subsets they are mostly or if not, all natural which would push SLRO scenes featuring upwards of 80-85% of models that are considered natural for this year's BG scenes. Tattoos are a bit harder to quantify since Freeones.com only gives yes and no as well as some location information. However, the majority of heavily tattooed models also have enhanced breast which would effectively be putting SLRO featuring mostly natural and low to moderately tattooed models.
The disclaimer here is that I'm assuming Freeones.com is accurate but having a quick glance it looks quite solid but happy to edit if people think there are mistakes.
Link to the data
jaybrahhh03 oh wow. Great job on that 
I expected this thread to get fully insane. Yet we have got out of proportion dose of reason and those causing the disturbance are mostly out.
Will65 We miss you! Please let us know where you are shooting for!
+1 for sure! From twitter, I saw that @vrfanservice and Blake Blossom shot a scene for RealJamVR:
Bucket619 check out all the scene ideas i posted
let me know what you think!
Fyi @Bucket619 I was chatting with @vrfanservice and he apologizes he can't respond to your post at the moment (he's lost access to forum).
Reddit upvotes/downvotes hardly mean anything. And also you have to realize that people on oculusnsfw aren't necessarily even SLR subscribers, or even pay for their porn.
On the other hand, if you look at the comments of the scene on SLR, yes it's obvious she is a controversial casting pick, but it's also very clear that there are some really happy and ecstatic Connie fans that finally get to see her in VR. Why rain on their parade? And why create an account on Reddit just to downvote it? What harm does it do that SLR releases a scene that you don't like, but others do? Let everyone have their cake. SLR releases 3-4 scenes a week, the most of any studio. Not every scene has to please EVERY person on this site. That's not even a possible feat to begin with.
jaybrahhh03 I don't understand why there is such an outcry from some users who are saying SLRO is leaning towards models with enhanced body parts or tattoos when the data says otherwise.
uhh there is only a single user in the entire thread who is being vocal on this particular topic.
[deleted]
- Edited
g2kbuffetboy you have to realize that people on oculusnsfw aren't necessarily even SLR subscribers, or even pay for their porn
True. But no one pirates SLR, even on the sites blocked in America. Well, maybe there is torrenting, of videos downgraded to unwatchable quality.
spacepirate when the data says otherwise.
Need some visualization? This does not include the tattoos on their male stars.
[deleted]
- Edited
spacepirate a single user in the entire thread
The post has multiple likes. Most folks are too polite to say the obvious.
By all means disregard my feedback if you think these models are a source of profit.
Doing it for @Will65. that's the only right thread for your comments like this
Will65
I'm pretty sure I am going to cancel my script sub if this is what we are going to get. These scripts are worse than the Handy-generated ones, and I thought those were pretty bad. But if people keep subbing for it (and they keep silencing anyone who complains), they'll just keep pushing it.
Let's keep the rest of this forum away from your negativity about every single thing.
and the one for @spacepirate
by special "souce" he means free and open source software called ffmpeg. you can try it yourself, if you can be bothered.
This thread is the best place for those comments. It's all yours
doublevr what part of that comment warranted a ban?
- Edited
spacepirate i don't want to comment that bs. This is the right place to keep it.
Ban was because you didn't keep it to this thread