@doublevr oublevr"#p97528 How do you know that?50xx has not released in America

VRexplorer I don't get this article. It says SLR will re-encode all videos to 120 fps to match the abilities of the Q3 display but when people ask for the same thing the response is that the whole exercise would be pointless?

      fenderwq
      Frame interpolation is pretty damn good (if done right) and much easier than impossibly adding extra high resolution original detail that doesn't exist.

      High res > frame rate

      If you want both, then you go high res then do frame interpolation.

          TemporaryName The issue is on quest 3 you can't have both. There is a decoding limit of 8192x4096@60fps. So if you want higher framerate you get lower resolution. I'm not against higer framerate. And with the rtx5000 series we can have both. Just saying that when 8k is the limit then resolution is much more important to me. But I we do agree on the basics

              fenderwq
              I see, for Quest 2/3 limitations.. I was talking in general, I'd much rather have resolution originals for future-proofing.. the videos looking amazing now and great well into the future.. and I'm interested in seeing the upcoming Blackmagic 16k videos.

              I also realized after that I already replied similarly over a year ago and you put a like on that, so yeah, seems we're on the same page.

                  do you think it's possible to change fps on a video? like changing resolution?

                  if my network is not good for 120fps i prefer to reduce fps rather than resolution !