Disclaimer my ipd is 68mm and From my point of view Deepinsex has beat everyone to the winning formula: 1) Most importantly correct scaling, distance and 3d roundness (perspective if you will) in the mish closeup and cowgirl 2) background that is chosen to highlight the girl, not the set. 3) lots of upclose face contact, and female encouragement 4) constistency of shots in fact very japanese but I actually think better. But it could be even more so: chief peeve points is: 1) moving the whole scene to load up a fake creampie. God that breaks immersion, please stop. figure out another way to cut. heres an example the japanese do. they get the girl to come in close to block the scene, and then they cut on the closin. easy solution hey? Suggestions: 1) please please some spit thanks. Not like its disgusting, but like its close and intimate. I would also like to find out whether the perspective they use is suitable for everyone, or just people with a wider IPD. Will post a flic with a mish time and ask for comments. In anycase, well done Deepinsex. you guys make a lot of my bank obsoleted.

Compliments to Deepinsex studio and comparison suggestion

rerun119

ableman I think Deepinsex is the best for scale and distance for the camera. The funny thing is that I think 68mm is at the outer limits of eye ipd and I closer to 61mm or so. But we both think it looks great. The 8K camera is at 60 (I think) so people have said that the scenes will look bigger for people with bigger ipd. I'm very close to the 60mm 8K camera and it looks huge to me.

Point being is that every studio should take note of Deepinsex's camera. They are 6K and look better than all most everybody else.