This is such an impossible way to judge both cameras off these two screenshots. K2 pro requires a lot of post processing to get to that stage, a lot of denoising and sharpening to get it that way. Look at SLR originals to see just how good you can make the K2 pro look, they really do magic with that camera. When you film RAW LT with the canon camera it does introduce just as much, if not, more noise, so the same amount of post processing is required to really clean it up, like these studios do with the K2 Pro, but just keep in mind how much longer and taxing the process will be when doing the same processing on 6K vs 8K file, I highly doubt that Nash and anyone other smaller studio is processing their footage as much as SLR does their K2 footage, if they did you would see proportionate results. I owned a K2 pro and now own the Canon, yes it has its pains but the canon, with the correct usage has a much sharper overall image, both in the foreground and background, regardless of the amount of processing the K2 Pro often starts to show it's limitations on the backgrounds or further subjects. For context, also look back at the first scenes people put out with the K2 Pro after the first year it was out vs today, you really think that if people spend the same amount of time with the canon system things will not also improve?
