180 equirectangular greenscreen videos?

metichemsi

rerun119 Can you double check one other 8k scene to get your opinion on scaling. This one is also 8k and in equirectangular format. Thanks

https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/romatic-sex-after-a-morning-walk-28220?playlist=269694

rerun119

metichemsi I will watch it tomorrow and let you know.

rerun119

metichemsi I watched it last night. It looks better because I was laying on my back the whole time in the video. I also had to zoom out a lot because it was shot to close for me. The zooming way out helped with the giantness but if you want to know if I think she or I (the male stunk cock) looked normal size to me. I answer is no. Maybe better but it don't look like real life. It's crazy to me that some 4 or 5 year old Wankz scenes look perfect in scaling and now 5 years later a lot look like trash. Scale vs clarity. If a scene visually looks great but everything is big then I turn it off in a matter of seconds. If the scene looks grainy but life like then I'll watch the whole thing.

Sandi_SLR

metichemsi Hey, just hold some known object like a can, the arm and can should be enough to judge the scale, no need for greenscreen.
For the distance, just have it close and move it away, we can pause.
Thanks!

metichemsi

Sandi_SLR sounds good, i'll work on this tonight when I get home from work. I'll have two versions, one converted to equirectangular on one in raw fisheye mode so you can also see the difference between basic conversion and the current r5c picture profile on the app.

What is the way to send you this? Is there an email or a direct message option with file attachments?

metichemsi

Sandi_SLR I think I finally figured out what is causing the scaling issue with the R5C footage. Your 8k canon scenes are all in 2:1 aspect ratio. The fisheye footage from the camera does not natively come out in that aspect ratio, its actually 256:135 or 8192x4320 resolution. Your scenes and even the canon utility spits out 2:1, this affects the scaling. One of the reasons I never noticed scaling issues is because I normally throw the raw fisheye footage on premiere and export it in its native resolution, when watching footage in that resolution and aspect ratio, even your r5c camera profile on deovr shows correct scaling. This alone made a significant difference and its why i did not notice scaling issues when I added my own canon footage as a background to your k2 pro footage, albeit, I did have to play with the zoom amount of my canon footage just due to the difference in resolution sizes between both video files. I have some sample canon footage if you still want it, just let me know how to best privately send it to you.

Sandi_SLR

metichemsi sandi@sexlikereal.com

metichemsi

Sandi_SLR files should be on their way. I dont know, but by the looks of it, it seems like the canon software might actually be cropping in more than 180 from its native 190 lens, which could explain the scaling for anyone using that software. I think you guys had already figured that out though because some of your 8k scenes with that camera were using your 190 profiles but you we also tweaking its aspect ratio back to 2:1, so i dont know how that combination would affect the final image.

This scene for example, it has the 190 profile but the scale of the video was still edited to 2:1
Would be curious to see this same scene but with its original aspect ratio instead. I imagine it would be something similar to using the 180 profile instead?
https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/an-intimate-experience-with-xxlayna-marie-30902

Anyways, take a look at the files and let me know if you notice anything interesting.

Thanks

LordCrash

rerun119 Scale vs clarity. If a scene visually looks great but everything is big then I turn it off in a matter of seconds. If the scene looks grainy but life like then I'll watch the whole thing.

Well, for me it's the other way round. If a scene is grainy I might turn it off in a matter of seconds. A scene with great visual clarity but "too big" girls is no issue for me though. 😉

Vrsumo2017

rerun119 It's crazy to me that some 4 or 5 year

Funny thing, In passthrough sum of them old wankz videos look really tiny, I have to move the hos to the right to make models large

Their new stuff, scale usually perfect in pt, no hos needed.

Badoink too, you'd think a scale perfect but if you put it in pt you can see if it to small or to big. I seen a few badoinks scale where it was very small. 🤷‍♂️

metichemsi

rerun119 thanks for following up on that scene. Would you be surprised if I told you that scene was also shot on a K2 Pro and not a Canon camera

Vrsumo2017

So are we going back to the r5c cam? 🍿🍿🍿🍿

metichemsi

Vrsumo2017 I'm still waiting for Sandi to review the samples I shared the other day to see what they figure out. I posted previously what I found and how I get accurate scaling out of that camera. Also, yes K2 footage scaling starts looking very small if the subject is not close enough. That is not an issue with the Canon system.

rerun119

metichemsi No I wouldn't be suprised because I don't usually have any idea what camera is used. In that scene her head started to curve and look really big when her head was close to the edge of the picture. It was shot to close up so I had to zoom out a lot so I'm sure that didn't help.

I like the stories of PS-Porn but they aways look so big. Are these all shot on the K2? If so then why do they look big when I guessing other scenes with the same camera don't? And how is it 8K if that camera I thought wasn't 8K?

Sandi_SLR

metichemsi Hey, the team is actually testing it now and they are reporting similar findings as you, I will be able to check on monday since I am intrigued how it does what it does.

metichemsi

Sandi_SLR sounds good, let me know if there is anything else I can assist with.

Have a great weekend!

metichemsi

Sandi_SLR Any update on this from your team? Really curious to see if you were able to find anything.

Thanks

OpeningThng19

If a remastering of the previously filmed scenes is all it takes to fix the scaling problems that would be awesome.

Lenovo

metichemsi Have you tried use heresphere to play fisheye videos? it worked good for me. l read all your comment but have no clue what your problem is😂 cause it's too professional. As for the scale problem of their 8k , they said they already have the 10k rig. As for the fisheye, it is more realistic to many people.

Sandi_SLR

metichemsi Hey, yea I am checking this today, will update later.

Sandi_SLR

metichemsi OK so I tried comparing 1 sample what canon utility makes and recreating same thing in Mistika for our fisheye 190° projection. There are 0 issues getting same scale. We will investigate further on more samples to be sure where it went wrong.

metichemsi

Lenovo you know, i recently found out about that app on one of these forums actually. I ended up purchasing it and I actually already like more than DeoVR. The quality of the video really is much better and the amount of customization is insane and yes, I have been able to fine tune and tweak the r5c footage a little better on that app. I also noticed that playback stability is better on that app. I get consistent and locked 90fps playback on my pimax headset, deovr struggles to maintain 90fps, it's always hovering between 87-90 and sometimes even in the low 80's specially when skipping videos.

« Previous Page Next Page »