metichemsi I watched it last night. It looks better because I was laying on my back the whole time in the video. I also had to zoom out a lot because it was shot to close for me. The zooming way out helped with the giantness but if you want to know if I think she or I (the male stunk cock) looked normal size to me. I answer is no. Maybe better but it don't look like real life. It's crazy to me that some 4 or 5 year old Wankz scenes look perfect in scaling and now 5 years later a lot look like trash. Scale vs clarity. If a scene visually looks great but everything is big then I turn it off in a matter of seconds. If the scene looks grainy but life like then I'll watch the whole thing.

      rerun119 Scale vs clarity. If a scene visually looks great but everything is big then I turn it off in a matter of seconds. If the scene looks grainy but life like then I'll watch the whole thing.

      Well, for me it's the other way round. If a scene is grainy I might turn it off in a matter of seconds. A scene with great visual clarity but "too big" girls is no issue for me though. 😉

        rerun119 It's crazy to me that some 4 or 5 year

        Funny thing, In passthrough sum of them old wankz videos look really tiny, I have to move the hos to the right to make models large

        Their new stuff, scale usually perfect in pt, no hos needed.

        Badoink too, you'd think a scale perfect but if you put it in pt you can see if it to small or to big. I seen a few badoinks scale where it was very small. 🤷‍♂️

          rerun119 thanks for following up on that scene. Would you be surprised if I told you that scene was also shot on a K2 Pro and not a Canon camera

              Vrsumo2017 I'm still waiting for Sandi to review the samples I shared the other day to see what they figure out. I posted previously what I found and how I get accurate scaling out of that camera. Also, yes K2 footage scaling starts looking very small if the subject is not close enough. That is not an issue with the Canon system.

                  metichemsi Hey, the team is actually testing it now and they are reporting similar findings as you, I will be able to check on monday since I am intrigued how it does what it does.

                      Sandi_SLR sounds good, let me know if there is anything else I can assist with.

                      Have a great weekend!

                        If a remastering of the previously filmed scenes is all it takes to fix the scaling problems that would be awesome.

                        metichemsi No I wouldn't be suprised because I don't usually have any idea what camera is used. In that scene her head started to curve and look really big when her head was close to the edge of the picture. It was shot to close up so I had to zoom out a lot so I'm sure that didn't help.

                        I like the stories of PS-Porn but they aways look so big. Are these all shot on the K2? If so then why do they look big when I guessing other scenes with the same camera don't? And how is it 8K if that camera I thought wasn't 8K?

                          metichemsi Have you tried use heresphere to play fisheye videos? it worked good for me. l read all your comment but have no clue what your problem is😂 cause it's too professional. As for the scale problem of their 8k , they said they already have the 10k rig. As for the fisheye, it is more realistic to many people.

                              metichemsi OK so I tried comparing 1 sample what canon utility makes and recreating same thing in Mistika for our fisheye 190° projection. There are 0 issues getting same scale. We will investigate further on more samples to be sure where it went wrong.

                                  Lenovo you know, i recently found out about that app on one of these forums actually. I ended up purchasing it and I actually already like more than DeoVR. The quality of the video really is much better and the amount of customization is insane and yes, I have been able to fine tune and tweak the r5c footage a little better on that app. I also noticed that playback stability is better on that app. I get consistent and locked 90fps playback on my pimax headset, deovr struggles to maintain 90fps, it's always hovering between 87-90 and sometimes even in the low 80's specially when skipping videos.

                                    Sandi_SLR Nice, please make sure to also recreate exporting the fisheye footage from mistika with the same resolution and aspect ratio as the CRM files, its not natively a 2:1 aspect ratio. I simply drop the CRM footage on premiere and export the fisheye footage in its native resolution and aspect ratio and your r5c camera profile on DeoVR shows great scaling on that footage. If you could replicate that process on mistika you should get similar results. Maybe dont do the usual VR workflow on mistika, simply drop in the footage, color grade, export in its original res and aspect ratio and try that also.

                                        metichemsi If I understand what all is being said and EVERY studio is shooting 8K wrong. And you can teach every studio how to fix and shoot all the 8K correctly. Then you need an AVN award. Because this has been a curse of vr porn for the last year. It has ruined these companies that bought that camera so now they just keep making scenes with big people month after month.

                                            metichemsi It is really hard to follow what you mean, why would you want to leave it original aspect ratio? For correct projection in app, you have to have it 2:1.
                                            As I said, there is no issue preparing same perceived scale in Mistika on our 190fisheaye as Canon utility does it on 180equi on the example I had to check so far, I am waiting for our videoeditor to create several samples from Canon and we will redo it in Mistika and compare scale.