• Content

  • Why don't we get into private deepfakes?

-aoxomoxoa- A SFW Deepfake before 'proper' deepfakes were around, AKB48 (Japanese Idol Band) did something 'like this' once... for a candy promo...
"Aimi Eguchi" of the Japanese Idol group AKB48, the 'fakest' girl around.

The Candy Promo Commercial

The making of "Aimi Eguchi"

(The video isn't embeddable for whatever reason, so just watch it on Youtube.)

Lengthy blog about AKB48, explains a lot really...
https://www.insidejapantours.com/blog/2014/08/12/akb48-the-surprising-truth-behind-the-worlds-biggest-band/

    6 days later
    3 months later

    hypertsunaz

    thatoculusdude
    I use 3DCombine can convert any video or picture to a 3d sbs.. has many parameters you can set for depth. can aslo generate depth maps for both video and pics too.

        harigeharry they are... the first one called switchero or whatever the vid is orginally emma rosie.. the one's I make are this quality and sometimes better.. just a lot of trial and error using swapface.org app. and a few others for tweaks

          14 days later

          doublevr

          It seems that it doesn't really require that much computation to train a video generation model. Hope someone could build a NSFW version soon.

          21 000 A100 GPU hours?
          That's like astonishingly less than I thought would be necessary for something like this.

            SchnuppiLilac whoa what the hell lol I've never seen these before, good thing I already have a sub on that site, time to download these puppies, thanks for pointing these out to us.

              SchnuppiLilac I would never watch a Whitney scene, i just dont find her attractive at all but that deepfake with that face I could watch all day, i probably have an asian fetish i guess but I still cant believe how much of a difference that made hahahaha I am an official believer now

                2 months later
                9 days later
                14 days later

                Avakian If it's "private" then legally there is no recourse. No one knows about that which is private. That is to say, if it were posted online publically then yeah there'd probably be an issue if a person objected to their image being used. However, for example, in my house RIGHT NOW I can print out a picture of a person's face and hang it up on my wall like a poster and no one will ever know. As such I'd say deepfake porn is "legal" as long as it's actually private. A business allowing tech that provides that capability is probably in a legal loophole as well because the act of changing a face doesn't not inherently imply a breaking of a person's image rights because theoretically you could change the face to ANYTHING that the upload box allows you to. I would agree though that it could probably be tricky. It wouldn't 100 percent prevent lawsuits unless no one ever sees the deepfake except the user.

                  a month later

                  doublevr
                  seems extremely unethical and easy to abuse. given some of the unhinged comment on videos, I wouldn't trust people around here with it.

                      bbrawl no worries. We are only considering controlled environment scenerios.

                      Hopefully we can get some news soon