doublevr Just thinking...
I guess some would appreciate that
HI, I wasn't a member at that time but I would love this. I love the outfits and the heels. In some 2d scenes there was always a kind of teaser at the beginning checking the girl out in nice poses. One of my all time favourite scenes is the non-POV parts of the Alyssia Kent scene. She is so beautiful and its great just checking her curves out especially in the photo shoot scene.
As long as it means more close-up shots. I'm often disappointed by how limiting POV can be. For example, I love reverse cowgirl position, but it always feels like I'm too far away from the booty. Obviously this is because the camera has to be positioned near the performer's head in order to simulate POV, but because of that, the camera ends up being 2-3 feet away from the girl. When the girl slides back from the dick and shoves her ass in my face though, I'm in heaven because I can get a full close-up view of her. Non-POV doesn't have to be as limiting, The camera can get a lot closer to the girl so I can admire her body more.
I am in favor of non pov due to better angles and more natural interactions from the actors. I assume in this case the latter is not applicable. But, I would still take it for the better angles.
Bonus video of the performer getting dressed/undressed in a room voyeur style before the scene.
I'm all for it, guess in the minority that actually prefer non-pov, as can get different different angles and see the girls whole body. Same way we all watched 2d at one point. Or can do like RealityLovers used to back in the day and release a POV and nonPOV of same scene, maybe not with all of them, but for certain ones here and there. But yeah, a little variety is nice regardless
ps-porn has started doing this recently and people are appreciating it, hope it turns to a more popular trend for all studios.
bacula8630 i have no interest in pov, its non pov or nothing for me, and I agree that id rather have a non pov section as a separate scene in its own right. its two distinctly different tastes. good on slr for wanting to cater for all their subscribers though, we might be fewer in number but that doesnt mean we should be ignored.
Still waiting for them non pov bonus clips, also grab the iPhone and film sum bts footage and sex action in spatial videos lets see how that looks!
But I'm very for non pov footage of slr production videos 
Seriously how hard is it to film like a 5 to 10 minute smash.
Example
Male model doing standing doggy on a bed for vr, the camera is already set for standing in front a bed all they gotta do is get on the bed and fuck! It's really that hard? Just call them bonus clips, I been suggesting for the longest bts footage and non pov sex action of the big studios like slr real jam and others.
Real jam and vrhush post bts 2d videos on redgifs, do that in vr, or hell ask real jam and vrgush for their 2d bts footage I'd watch that in vr in 2d too!
Hell, Why not get the directors whip the phone out and film sum 2d action too, upload that too to slr, it's all content! It's all in vr!
Plus when I'm not in my headset I might watch sum vr videos here at slr on my phone but add in 2d porn from recent shoots as bonus clips! 
I see yall doing 2d trailers for the vr videos, will thoes be uploaded to slr? If yall whipping out the two 2d for trailers...might as well film 2d smashing and upload it.
If you film it, they will cum! (In a whisper)
I would much rather you just film the woman for 10-15 mins standing, talking, dancing, or moving in some way. Stable camera full frontal nudity is HARD to find in VR, which is insane
dradical hard to believe, but true. More difficult to get amazing views of the female body when every video simply shows the same 4-5 sec positions.
I think the only no pov i would like to see if when they are in squatted cowgirl or standing cowgirl, like on the jacknjill videos. Other than that, i would rather the rest in POV. Maybe standing doggy when they have their legs together, i cant stand when they do that in POV, there is nothing attractive about it. That might look better in voyeur.
I don't mind some initial non-POV at the start of scenes to set up the storyline, but the back and forth and back and forth from non-POV to POV just takes me out of the immersion.
Sounds like a great idea. Would love to see on all videos
samuraiibob oh god no please dont take pov cowgirl from me its one of the last things I have
if a big tit video finally comes out and the cowgirl scene isnt POV, Ill be back
ItsForTheArticles I don't mind some initial non-POV at the start of scenes to set up the storyline
Me either but it breaks their "immersion" so it would have to be separate from the scene, it would have to be bonus clips. I hope they start doing this I really thought they would do it, they should...it's content
Real jam vrhush film bts non pov but in 2d, I want it in vr.
ItsForTheArticles I don't mind some initial non-POV at the start of scenes to set up the storyline
What about if they leave it in POV but the guy (being me) talks at the beginning to make a better story? Like TabooVRPorn does.
Do you think that would turn a lot of people off? It doesn't for me.
rerun119 its just that pov doesnt do it for everyone. I cant bear it, its dull and constantly retreads the same ground(in my opinion), I dont think should mix it up though, keep it pov, and either set up another rig to shoot non pov at the same time, or make a non pov scene once a month. The film makers need to get their thinking caps on and deal with it. its wrong to ignore a section of the customer base, even if they are a minority. vr porn will remain niche and devoid of creativity while ever pov is the bulk of the conent.
chanser I absolutely agree even though I am firmly in the POV fan camp. Often these types of discussions devolve because its more a disagreement about degree or amount than true objection to forays into alternative paradigms. I don't like non-pov or actor voice in my mainstream VR porn, but, as long as its just an occasional thing, I can fast-forward or skip. This gives options to those who do like non-VR/etc.
And one additional point I'd like to highlight: when you do something that "ruins" a scene for a group of viewers, there are often alternatives out there for those viewers to switch to. However, when the scene involves a "one-and-done" actress or a unique "never-before-never-again" scenario, then there are no truly equivalent alternates. I was thinking about this from my perspective (POV, non-PT), but its also true that there are people out there that will never get a chance to see their "optimum" scene--whether thats a favorite actress in PT or a niche scenario like a non-POV lesbian harem orgy.
I think a solution will be to generally follow the numbers of statistical popularity while also reserving a small percentage of scenes for experimentation and niche content.
fuccaneer good post/reply, thank you. there is room for us all within this community, and of course supply and demand will dictate the type of content produced in general, you're absolutely right. your suggestion around a small percentage being reserved for more niche content would be welcomed, certainly by me. i go for solo and lesbian passthrough and non pov, in that order. i never watch pov scenes.
rerun119
Setup male talking wouldn't kill it for me, but even better would be enough creativity in the script to not require male talking.
