It just occurred to me about a technique used by J. Stephen Hicks, probably the best porn still photographer in the business (the guy behind the site Digital Desire) and had made huge contributions to the porn industry before he died some years ago. He was a master at making ordinary girls look ravishing and helped move the industry away from the heavy-filtered shots, such as done by others such as Suze Randall, to using natural lighting instead.
Anyway, I remember one of his "backstage" photo sets where one of his male assistants was holding a small vile of oil and a makeup brush. He was about to "paint" the oil on the inner lips of the model's labia. The advantage was that the oil would make close-ups of the labia sparkle from the lighting, drawing your eyes to the apparently, sexually-excited model.
I also recall that he overapplied the oil to photo sets of a couple models in earlier years, causing the oil to drip excessively. It was clearly phony and he must have realized it because in later photo sets he made sure the oil was applied just to the inner lips of extended labia -- just enough to moisten her suggestively.
I really do think that an effort should be made to ensure that when revealing the pussies in any VR scenes that the director take a moment to moisten the girl's inner lips. Again, I absolutely hate having a girl stick her pussy into the camera and say how wet she is and yet the pussy is dry. Actually, I hate the girl faking that the viewer is licking her because all the sounds she makes are just "faking it" and it turns me off to think that any sounds of an orgasm with a dick in her later are also faked. In fact, I am so turned off by dry pussies that I am working on getting a petition together to see if we can get a law passed banning dry pussies in general.
It kind of makes me think about another thing that directors can do in preparation of revealing a girl's private parts, which also reminds me of another little personal experience:
Some time ago, when I met a hot chick at a bar, she invited me back to her place. She sat me on her couch, went to the fridge, and brought back a bowl of ice cubes. She was wearing a wispy, fairly sheer blouse with no bra. Her nipples could be barely seen poking up from under the material. She said that she understood how much men liked nipples and asked if I shared that opinion. I said I did. And with that, she took an ice cube from the bowl, handed it to me, and asked that I press it against the blouse over each of her nipples to stiffen them. I obliged, and within moments, each nipple firmed-up, thrusting the blouse out seductively. It also helped that the material got moistened in the process, which helped to not only outline the nipples, but bring in relief the texture of the areolas as the soaked material clung to them. She then said that if at any point in our conversation that her nipples became soft, I must take an ice cube and press it against her nipples again. I don't remember much more about any conversation on the couch after that since what happened next was all in the bedroom.
My point here is that a bunch of the models on this site have nipples that are quite perky and could possibly be enhanced further with this ice-cube technique. The essence of making it effective, of course, is that the girl not be in any rush to tear off her blouse and that the director makes sure to ogle the girl's nipples slowly as the blouse is gently removed. If the nipples sit on her tits sufficiently thrust forward, and they are sufficiently stiff, the blouse can even appear to hang off just her nipples for a moment before it drops to the floor, which is a great sequence if taken from a side profile. I have seen this effect on a couple of still photo sets and it is quite effective. Of course, it also means she wouldn't wear a bra.
But this is getting off the topic of wet pussies. A lot can be done to emphasize nipples in the VR scenes and I could go on too long about that. It is something that directors might consider, though.
