• Content

  • Some videos are being removed for compliance purposes

There should be some sort of tag or identification on videos that are planned to be removed. This would help the subscribers to download the liked originals.

So what about videos people bought directly (not using subscription)? Are you going to refund people or what is the deal here? Because it's one thing to have a subscription and have some part of it taken away, but completely another if someone paid for something in full and it's taken away.

    badman666 users should retain access to ppv content without interruption.
    The question could have been asked in less provocative way. Please let me know if you have any problem accessing your ppv library.

      It's impossible to track the videos once you get more than few of them. I actually tried to figure out which videos I bought to figure out if some of them were not taken away but it's impossible. All the emails I've gotten were regarding payment and they just have money values and do not contain any info about bought content. There is no history of purchases in user profile... So even if you'd taken away something it would be difficult to determine what that was. I'm sure you can understand my frustration with the topic.

        badman666 you should be fine. The system is set that way that everything ppv always stays. The changes only affect future events.

          Samsonite121 Obviously... but if they remove a video how do you know it does not dissapear from there... Anyways I consider the question answered so we can move on from this particular subject.

            Suggestion: While you're in the process of updating for compliance and perhaps re-branding to a sexual wellness site, you might consider refraining from the use of the word "slut" in video titles to refer to women. Yes, it's great to toss around the term during dirty talk, but context means a lot, and my experience is that most women find it a bit degrading until after they are warmed up (at which point it seems to turn them on). Putting in the titles might not be the best idea.

            doublevr This is def something I want to keep an eye on. I'm in the process of starting my own studio. And I 100% want to shoot pissing videos. Also have a series planned out that evolves around drinking/party games lol. If I can't put it here, I respect that. Don't mean I won't shoot and sell it though.

            Hell to really piss some people off. I'm going to buy a bottle of jack, a nun's outfit and find a alley somewhere..

                LordCrash I will make a forum post a little closer to when I'm ready to shoot so I can get feedback from people. I am mainly looking to focus on girls pissing outdoors. But toilets sinks and floors (with easy clean up) are not off the table, . Not so much interested in them pissing on each other or anything. There is a site that has nothing but that. But open to suggestions. My goal is to release my first video on Aug 1st. And by the end of 2022 have at least 6-10 pissing videos. They won't be long. 5-8 mins. So I should be able to get most of the models I work with, to do one. That is the hope at least.

                  spacepirate

                  When they came for the pissing vids I did nothing cause I didn't like pissing vids.
                  When they came for the sleeping vids I did nothing casue I didn't like sleeping vids.
                  When they came for the step-silbing vids I did nothing cause I didn't like step-sibling vids.

                  Not trying to call you out, but your comment reminded me of something I heard ages ago.

                    PossiblyAPolarBear Most of the 'significant academic research' is radical feminist advocacy research.You could equally claim that the porn in question acts as substitute to real abuse. There have been 'significant academic research' that suggests that to be the case. It would also appear to be common sense. It's the reason why the 'theists' were against masturbation in the first place - it gave an outlet to the sexual impluse that did not result in reproduction (sex), and a larger following and more money for their churches.

                    You're right about the UK and the EU also being engaged in the war against porn. It should be noted though that several years ago, the UK actually took pissing off its list of 'extreme porn'.

                      doublevr Wow man. Lots of my favorite Vids were in those categories. Royal flush was one of the main reasons I bought a life time membership. This is crazy. Did they fine you or something? That was a $1000 I spent to have that video
                      I want those videos back.

                          Don't suppose we can get a list of removed vids? Save me time searching for some, thinking I mis-remembered the title, and spending hours looking for a vid if it's just been caught up by the purity police.

                          6 days later

                          Lol, I had an affiliate blog where I exclusively reviewed pissing videos on SLR

                          So I happen to know that of those 51 videos, 49 were taken down, but two remain due to having pissing scenes, but no pissing tags:

                          Sexual H*rassment Clinic – Cock Checkup - Asian Schoolgirl Fingering Blowjob (starts at approx 1hr 20min mark)
                          Iori Kogawa – Reverse Confinement VR: My Mistress is the Wife Next Door; Dominated by the Cheating Wife (starts at approx 11 min 30 sec mark)
                          (^ ok 2nd one might not explicitly pissing, maybe would be more accurately tagged as Toilets, but beggars can't be choosers!)