Why does ARPORN passthrough look better than SLR passthrough?

It's about the editing and exporting.
Those AR videos take a shitload of processing power.
To generate the Arsians Halloween scene in 8k60 it took a week of rendering. We had to cheat in multiple ways to even get it to release, like render into PNG so we can continue after power outages etc.
This week I finally managed to get a 5090 and can now start to edit AR videos how they are supposed to be done, with color correction etc.
Keep in mind I am the only third party AR producer in the world because of the technical difficulty, it is way too early to experiment with the medium if you want to be commercially successful.

It costs a fortune in equipment and makes less than VR because most users can't play AR content yet.

Personally I don't like anything AR porn has shot until now because there never is anal, that can't be fixed with editing.

Arsians_com because most users can't play AR content yet.

What AR content are you referring to, where can it be found and what does it take to play it? I am a bit confused as you mentioned the Arsians Halloween scene and this is a regular video on SLR.

Teeteeboi I don't agree because for me SLR has largely caught up with the ARPorn studio recently and they have largely surpassed them whether it be on casting, video length, scaling and sharpness I think they have regained their place as leader while the videos from the ARPorn studio continue to deteriorate on all points and they have not even resolved their scaling problems since the beginning while everyone pointed it out to them which proves that they unfortunately don't care.

Teeteeboi any specifics? can't be true

n0den they have not even resolved their scaling problems since the beginning

I started to think I was the only one noticing this... Doesn't matter how good the image quality is, these projection issues make most parts of these videos unusable for humans from planet Earth.