adinihsan I'm not trying to start an argument. Just wondering what you would say are the differences between 2d and VR other an VR being in POV, even some 2d can be POV.
For me the difference is how the porn looks. And maybe this is just me but what I like so much about VR is that it can seem real in the moment. So that means the story can feel like something that could happen to me. A big one is that the acting feels real and not like porn stars fucking for a video.
Strong's stories are the most typical 2d or any porn stories there are. Zero different than hundreds of other 2d porn with the same 2d acting in it. I could just watch a FLAT 2D film in POV and get the same story and acting.
Plus the shots are all the same. Same house as Nash, same starting couch, same bedroom, same order of positions. All the same only the camera is too far away for me compared to Nash.
Big dicks are all over Porn in general. Naughty America only shoots giant dicks if that is what somebody is into. I think that is where Mack came from and that seems to be all he knew.
The new directors had different stories than anything SLR has done before. They had different houses, different ways of telling the story, different angles.
Maybe the thing is that Strongs videos feel like he says now we need 2 minutes of slapping, now we need 2 minutes of ball licking. It feels like porn which for me means it's not immersive because it don't feel real at all.
NON-POV I could care less about but it's not that rare. It might not be the majority of scenes but there are thousands of them.