I for one love it!! Even though it's FAR from perfect, seeing your own dick rubbing up against and sliding into the chick is adding really another layer of immersiveness, at least for me. This does has a lot of potential! I'm sure tons of people will complain about it for not being perfect, but I already love it!

I think @VRLover69 was keen to have movies shot with the male actor wearing a colored condom, I kinda figured it wouldn't work well. And a lot of times it doesn't but when it does, it's damn awesome!

Would indeed be a great idea to shoot a native PT scene that way, have the guys dick sit still without him touching it and also have the girl move its position as little as possible and it's going to be awesome. It indeeds stops working when the dick moves all around cause obviously you'd have to move your dick the exact same way which is kinda impossible. But damn, the potential is there for sure!

    fenderwq And yeah change that naming, pov/non pov just is confusing. Call it 'with male actor' and 'without male actor' instead.

      harigeharry sorry, but no, it's just a horrible idea. And yes I've seen plenty of examples with the AI. The chances that your dick is in the right direction, perspective, exactly the same shape and size, constantly overlapping whit the alpha cut out, etc. Is super slim and hard to "align". Then you have the discrepancies between the "perspective"/focal point of your passthrough vid and the scene (neither is volumetric and this often causes big issues making it look your dick is somewhere else even if it's in the cutout). Then you have your hand or the toy in the way. Would it be cool if it worked? Hell yes! Does it even come close to working, hell no. Maybe with some big Ai advances in the future though.
      Besides condoms in porn is blasphemy

          fenderwq Your last point is a very valid one unfortunately. PT already is divisive, some love it, some hate it. And the people in that last category will hate it even more when they now need to stare at a condom...

          However I don't agree to your other points. Alignment issues can be overcome by having the actors (especially the male one) not move the dick around, have it steady in one place. Also your own hand blocking the dick is at least for me no issue at all, since your hand will be on top of it, which will be hidden by the female actor's image anyway (behind it), so you won't see your own hand, you'll only see the lower part of your dick anyway, just like when you fuck in real life. The penis size, hmmm about that one I'm not really sure. I guess since I'm blessed with a big one I haven't experienced any problems here and I'm pretty sure at least some variance won't matter anyway. But yeah for people with quite small penises this might be a problem, not sure ...

          But yeah especially the condom thing might be a problem for non PT viewers. Maybe a temp solution would be to at least try to have the AI work as good as possible by filming in such a way that the AI will work best: having the actors not move the dick around and have the male actor never touch it.

              VRLover69 Hey mate, no not not yet, however as this topic explains, it works now with AI, you can just hide the male actor including his penis.

                doublevr how about "Schlong Be Gone"?

                I'm kidding of course. I think non pov is fine but I'm sure you guys will come up with something good.

                There's always going to be complainers and arm chair quarterbacks, either way.

                    VRLover69 Agreed. I for one really admire all that SLR is doing here. It's not perfect yet, but man, it's damn awesome as it is already. Yesterday I tried playing a (non PT) normal VR scene with a girl that I find extremely hot but just couldn't watch it anymore, just like I can't watch flat porn anymore. PT really ruined regular VR for me, I can't watch it anymore unless it's PT. Even AI PT in its current state, with all of its short comings, is already so much better than regular VR for me.

                        harigeharry lol, it doesn't matter if you have a large or small cock. The point is that size of the male talent will vary and so will that of the viewer. So if yours is very close to the form and size of the guy of the passthrough vids you won't have much issue with his vids but you will inherently have issues with male talent that are not normal sized like that guy. Then you are looking at the dick so the alignment needs to be very precise too.

                        Also, keeping the dick perfectly straight, no way that that's gonna happen and even if they somehow managed that: you still have all the technical issues I mentioned.

                        Anyways, I hope they crack it some day, I'm with you on that, but that day will come after some serious technical advances.

                            fenderwq I think our main difference is that you need it to work 'near perfect' for you to enjoy it. I already enjoy it right now! Honestly, I already swap out the male actor because I just really enjoy seeing my own dick slide into the girl. And sure, it's far from perfect, I see that too, but I already like it a lot, enough to actually use this feature already.

                            BTW @doublevr posted the idea in that other thread to use a male torso, now THAT would improve things 100% for sure. Of course I agree, in order for it to be 'near perfect' we'd need really intelligent AI and I don't think that will happen anytime soon (then again, the tech already exists in certain forms). But I'm confident that with a male torso they could take this at least to a next level.

                                harigeharry You are probably right. I don't think it's good enough but i always found quality very important for enjoyment. Maybe they can have a dick in dick out feature with the AI ones.

                                I read the post too but I am not a fan of the male torso although it seems to have a some good things going for it on paper. Probably for very similar reasons and I think it's a different dynamic too. Also, never seen one I found convincing enough and no real cumahot.