spacepirate it supports my argument as there is nothing remotely disagreeable about that post and yet itās -10. Itās proof that the function is being abused in a way that was not intended.
I have a different take than many others on here when it comes to VR porn so I can accept that many of my opinions are not held by others and will garner some disagreement. Thatās fine, Iāve been here for a long time now, so if genuine disagreement really bothered me, I would not continue to post things that I know many will disagree with. I can take it. I obviously like it when my posts gain approval more than when they donāt but I feel itās important to say what I want to say so a few thumbs down clicks wonāt stop me. The post I brought up though maybe brings into focus that not all the downvotes on peopleās posts are genuine, there are a group of people indiscriminately downvoting anything positive about anything they donāt like. This guy hadnāt even seen the scene yet, just said that he liked the girls and was looking forward to watching it. Whatās to disagree with there?
Yes, I have an agenda, if you like, as far as Iād like to see some more hardcore scenes in VR. I donāt go into every girlfriend simulation scene and downvote all the positive comments though. I usually donāt bother commenting at all on scenes Iām not into. I also like some intimate vanilla scenes and give positive feedback on them, how does that fit with my āagendaā. Itās not some toxic thing with me. Iām not looking to eradicate all vanilla porn, just have some variety.
If people donāt like, for example, anal scenes, donāt watch them, donāt click ā¤ļø on them. The site will soon get the message that theyāre unpopular. You donāt need to crap on others for liking a scene that you donāt. At least make these 10 people actually post their reasons for crapping on that guys post, not just let them get away with an easy single click.