14 days later
12 days later
19 days later

Hoping for a closer mish scene with this one! =D 🤞

I have watched the trailer and the video somehow looks very blurry or out of focus. Will the actual scene look the same?

    SchnuppiLilac

    Unfortunately yes 🙁

    Some feedback for this scene:
    It was finally a long awaited Raw Taboo scene, while it has some nice parts, unfortunately due to image issues (almost unwatchable in parts) ultimately it did not do Penny justice.

    The pluses:

    • Good build up (although would have been better if the story was sequel of the first Penny RT scene)
    • Good "SLRO length" with plenty of action
    • Dirty talk did not disappoint, as expected with Penny
    • Nice immersive elements: ear licking, lengthy kissing, panty play (with grool!), keep this going!

    The minuses:

    • Most obviously, poor visual quality over large parts (at least on my device on 2880p settings), blurry even at moderate distance from camera, I felt like I was short sighted. The scale was distorted at the start such that Penny's head was disproportionately small.
    • This is yet another Nash scene with the "formulaic" position switch: Seated, then lay down, then missionary then climax. Almost unchanged (esp. the pre-climax missionary) over the last 20 odd Nash scenes. For the love of god, as a firm fan favorite producer, please make more scenes with sit-down/laydown climax (I'm really missing the laydown creampies), and less "formulaic" position progressions.
    • And also I dislike it when the male talent "feeds" the actress the creampie. I hate seeing a burly hairy arm during the best part of the scene.

      The quality was so bad, it reminded me the notorious Ten to One scene.

      SchnuppiLilac Is there any way to fix/improve the visual quality?

      Sounds like it was an on-set issue with the camera, so sadly not something that can be fixed in post-production. Sorry for that.

      Penny is a favorite of ours though, so I have little doubt she'll be back.

        justsomedude101 Sounds like it was an on-set issue with the camera

        Perhaps if the crews shot a short amount of test footage and then watched that back, this sort of thing could be avoided or minimised? Camera adjustment errors should show up on the raw footage, I appreciate it isn't processed and corrected but if it's an obvious focus issue, for example, it should show up?

        Imagine spending all day shooting a scene to discover that your camera settings were broken somehow and the footage is terrible. It's a waste of everyone's time if that could be avoided somehow by more careful testing and setup.