Going back to the original point I think your age can affect the type of girls you like in porn because fashions and trends change over time. When I was a teenager growing up, men were much more obsessed with big tits. The newspapers in the U.K. had topless girls on page 3 and they were all girls with huge tits. It made stars out of girls like Samantha Fox, Linda Lusardi and others, they were literally household names and every mans fantasy. You also had Baywatch on TV with Erika Eleniak and Pamela Anderson with huge boobs. That was what all of us teen boys grew up fantasising about and that’s who we still probably look for in porn to a degree.

Fast forward to now, post the whole size zero waif movement and who are your big female sex symbols? Gal Gadot, Taylor Swift, Beyoncé, Rihanna? I’m not saying these are size zero by the way, absolutely not, but big boobs no longer seem to be such a big deal as they were in the 80’s so kids growing up in the last 10 years or so won’t have that same Jessica Rabbit type fantasy woman that us older people have.

Obviously I’m generalising here, not everyone from any era likes the same thing and some guys just want to see teen girls no matter how old they get but I do think the fashion in your formative years probably has an effect.

    rerun119 You can't stop time so its better to learn to love older women.

    That's what escorts are for. Make a lot of money when you are young so that you don't have to "learn to love older women."

        petermc
        I think it has less to do with time and age (at least not in the last 40-50 years) but more with your socio-economic background and simply the environment you grew up in etc.

        It's imho a false receiption that in the 80s, or 90s or the early 00s there were only sex symbols with big tits. Maybe you only remember those who you were personally into at that time but it doesn't mean that there weren't a lot of females with rather small or medium sized boobs during the last 40 or 50 years who were generally perceived as sex symbols at the time.

        Take e.g. Sharon Stone, Kim Basinger, Cindy Crawford, Demi Moore, Julia Roberts, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Kelly LeBrock, Brooke Shields, Liv Tyler, Bo Derek, Carrie Fisher, Michelle Pfeiffer, Denise Richards, Emmanuelle Béart and many more. Some of them had smaller boobs and some of them bigger boobs. Almost zero of them had giant tits or even giant fake tits or whatever.

        It's right thought that during the 90s and early 20s big tits were trendy, but imho only in the porn industry and the blue-collar boulevard (like the UK yellow press you mentioned). I'm not sure whether this was a reaction to huge demand for huge tits bakc then or rather a reaction to growing possiblities of getting huge tits due to the upcoming surgery options. Imho it was a rather short time though, maybe lasted 5-10 years top. And I guess it's also a national or rather local question since in the UK, for example, big tits still seem to be much more popular than e.g. here in Germany. But I guess there is some kind of more in-depth scientific research to be made on the topic, it's a lot of guessing involved here...

        And since you mentioned Erika Eleniak: she had "only" medium-sized boobs. They were just very well presented (and pretty jammed) in these red swim suits... 😉

        I'd bet a huge majority of guys would say that she has a fucking hot body now as they had said it like 20 years ago... 😉

            LordCrash Yeah, I don’t necessarily mean like crazy size but boobs and curves in general were definitely more of a thing back then than today. People like Kim Basinger and Cindy Crawford didn’t have big boobs but they definitely weren’t thin flat chested teens either, they had a curvy figure. I’m also generalising to a degree as there was still room for someone who was just stunningly beautiful in the face. For horny teens like me and my friends though at that time, boobs were what mattered. I don’t mean absolutely out of proportion silly boobs but a nice cleavage. I actually was a huge fan of Kim Basinger but, with her, it was just her sexiness, not a body part. Similar to an Angelina Jolie, she just exuded sex.

            I think mainland Europe and European porn is a little different too than UK/US porn. Euro porn has always seemed to feature more natural looking girls. Even in the 90’s/00’s when the likes of Jenna Jameson and similar girls were dominating US porn, Euro porn was more about the likes of Silvia Saint, Cassandra Wilde, Jane Darling, Ellen Saint and countless others. Europe always had more sophisticated tastes!

            Once you get into the 90’s and 2000’s, even in the UK/US, it does begin to change like you say with people like Sarah Michelle Gellar, Gillian Anderson, Jennifer Lopez and more becoming big sex symbols. There were still girls like Denise Richards, Kelly Brook, Scarlett Johansen who had good tits but it was changing.

            Now, big boobs are hardly celebrated at all, even in porn. A lot of porn now seems to be teen-centric, I don’t know whether that was down to Britney Spears and that schoolgirl video but it’s definitely been a cultural shift over the years.

              One old man viewpoint which I can get behind -

              I do think clothes and makeup were better back then - I am not a fan of the Amy Winehouse eye makeup. I also think some of the styling on clothes (especially lingerie and lace) was more sexy back 20 years ago.

              I notice it when I watch reality shows which were released in the early 2000s such as "Amazing Race" - a lot of the girls looked hotter back then, and its obviously down to fashion / styling preferences

              rerun119 I get what you mean, but I tend to differentiate (online) porn from real life. Unlike real life you have so much choice online so I only want to see the best of what I like.

                LordCrash What? You spend all day commenting on every thread of every VR porn site in the known universe, but escorts are a bridge too far? Sorry to break it to you, but a not insignificant number of the models we stare at on our headsets escort as well (and are much more interesting in person).

                    Will65
                    You interpret a lot into my post while knowing absolutely nothing about my actual intention. But ok. 😉

                        The pornstars that excite me the most are pornstars that I can relate to, women that resemble women I interact with day to day in real life. When I was in college, I was turned on by younger pornstars that were my age at the time. Milfs didn't do much for me. Now that I'm older, I like natural milfs. I still find younger women attractive, I think it's pure biology for guys to always find 20-year-olds hot, but they're not relatable to me anymore so I'm not immersed in any storyline with them.

                          17 days later

                          catflap
                          Yes, this may be the actual thing I just wanna say. How olders can be look so attractive than the young ones. Time to take a look at sissy phone sex where the youngs are looks so cool in all features when compared to olds. But I would say Olds are also good in many ways.

                            Forty years ago I liked models age 18-30 in porn, and that's still what I like today.

                            I prefer casual clothing that hot women I see on the street wear - ripped jeans drive me mad - and that tends to be worn more by younger models, because of stepdaughter or student scenarios. Those scenarios don't do much for me - the whole incest thing is a big turn-off for me, to the point that I deliberately try to ignore the dialog in some videos - but the outfits are great.

                            Huge boobs and duck lips are a turn-off for me, and those seem to be more of a default among MILF videos.

                            One way my tastes have changed is tattoos; I used to be completely indifferent to tattoos, and now I find them an enormous turn-on.