• Content

  • Any thoughts why these scenes didn't go well?

I think this is werid that they get so little views cause those girls got the most of likes in the pornstar suggestion thread. They are not my type at all though.

Some of the pictures do not reflect the beauty of the pornstar.
Most of people do not watch the details of the face and make a judgement about a pornstar.
Pictures do not show how a girl will look in VR ... It takes hours to analyze the symetry of the face, the shape of the eyes, the brighness of the eyes, the density of the skin, the elasticity, the distance between the eyes and the nose, the proportion, the rarity, the distance between the chin and the mouth, the BF that will affect how we could see the bone structure on the face.

    Streetdanceboy I think this is werid that they get so little views cause those girls got the most of likes in the pornstar suggestion thread.

    SLR has tens of thousands of customers that likely trend towards mainstrem porn and mainstream models - that's why they call it mainstream. The forum population is a few dozen at best, mostly the same people all the time, there to push a niche agenda of their individual likes. That SLR pays so much attention to that is a bit odd to me, and probably the source of the complaints.

        If only they shot more young looking girls! That’s sarcasm by the way.

        If what you’re saying about model requests is true, I’d guess people probably don’t request teen looking girls so much as that’s pretty much all we ever get already. People who are solely into teen looking girls don’t need to make too many requests as they get what they want most of the time. People who want to see different types of models and more established names perhaps are the ones most vocal in that thread.

        Will65 Agreed. The most objective way to judge what performs well with the broader SLR audience in general is to look at the top performing videos and the casting for those videos. For the past year, this has meant mostly beautiful young girls who are new to hardcore VR.

        Not everybody is into that, and that is ok. Niches should also be catered for, but you should not expect niche videos to be as popular as mainstream porn.

        The key here is balance. Continue to mostly cast young, beautiful girls new to the industry as these make the most customers happy. But also have a portion of your videos dedicated towards niches so that those with other tastes also have videos they can enjoy.

            dango789 what’s weird to me though is that I would’ve thought VR porn would be a lot to handle for new girls. They have to carry the whole scene on their own, keep eye contact with the camera and get very little verbal communication from their co-star. That’s a lot of extra stuff for someone who’s not even used to having sex on camera yet. Much easier I would’ve thought to start in 2D porn where you don’t have so much to worry about and come back to VR when you’re more at home in front of a camera.

                petermc It's amazing indeed how these new girls have risen up to the task! The eye contact and intimacy by Agatha Vega and Eve Sweet were on point.

                  Hurto11 Is the handy really that worth it? Seems like way more of a hassle than just jacking off normally. People really care that much about scripts? That shit doesn't matter to me at all. I've never tried a handy or anything

                  You appear to have strong opinions about something you have no experience with. You don't care about scripts because you don't own a device that can play them? I mean, don't care about EV charging networks because I don't own an EV, but I do understand why people who drive an EV would care.

                  The fact that so many people care about scripts might give you a clue as to the value of interactive content to those of us who've actually tried it.

                    Hunky-Dory i can speculate they invested a fortune purchasing vrporn.com and had to cut elsewhere.

                    One scene is like $10k now and they probably see they can successfully market old backlog to get people join.

                        I wish the scenes were more provocative, the actual scenes are very straightforward. The woman appears, says two words, takes off her clothes and fucks. I like VRLatina's scenes, there's always time for the girl to show her attributes in a provocative and thought-provoking way. You don't even have to be a supermodel, but the scene needs to make you interested in that girl. Example: https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/my-stunning-senorita-32214

                          filis I wish the scenes were more provocative, the actual scenes are very straightforward. The woman appears, says two words, takes off her clothes and fucks.

                          Fully agree with this. And it makes for videos that are all kinda samey.
                          Probably also why I like to start off with scenes from StasyQVR or StripzVR, they show angles of the models we just don't get in most regular scenes at all and weirdly enough there's nothing in between that type of solo showing-off the curves and regular b/g fucking scenes.
                          Same goes for lingerie, sexy boots, garter & thighs, etc. It all comes off quickly in the first 5-10 mins tops, it's rare to see a scene where some of it stays on throughout a scene (I can understand it might not be comfortable for shooting very long scenes though).

                              Aerowen would be great tk start some of the scene with a stacy q like strip tease, get us excited before the vr fucking. Builds the mood way more for me then conversation and then clothes off.

                                doublevr The last scenes did not look cheap at all and some of them were actually quite nice. The 35 min Freya Parker scene had an extensive introduction and they even booked another female performer as a real estate agent without involving her in the action. It should have been easy to extend the action by 15 min if they wanted to. So maybe it's an artistic decision. Or maybe they are holding some footage back for their new spin-offs. Following the success of BlowVR, get ready for CGVR, RevCGVR, MishVR, WoofWoofVR 😉 I think the current one-scene-per-week strategy might rather be a sign that going exclusive might not have fully paid out yet.

                                  Aerowen I wish they would show the women in evening dress. Then pull the dress up and have her get on top of you. That is so hot. She could tease you beforehand but don't take it off at first.

                                  This scene was looking so promising in the beginning with both girls in hot dresses. It lasted about 2 minutes then they moved the camera and the girls showed up in lingerie. Why make them put on the dresses if they are just going to take them back off and not even in front of the camera.

                                  Sharing My Neighbors Massive Cock

                                  https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/sharing-my-neighbors-massive-cock-32838

                                  You can still do both if you really want them in lingerie. They can have it underneath and over time take the dress off to show the lingerie they have on. That would be a lot sexier.
                                  @AlexMack

                                      rerun119 Thank you for the comment. I'll definitely have a girl keep a dress on for a while in the future projects. In this particular scene the lingerie didn't fit very well under the dresses, and it just looked bad.

                                      Regards,
                                      Alex

                                          AlexMack Clothes in the sex scenes is a total turn off for me.

                                          It's fine in the intro or in the seduction, or for a while, but please don't use it in the whole movie.