I wanted to suggest a feature idea for the devs to consider. What if users had the ability to right after they orgasm watching a scene, to click the orgasm icon that then lets them mark that part of the video with a confirmed orgasm. The icon could be a rocket or the squirt emoji or whatever you want it to be. It turns on orgasm mode to select the timestamp.

I was thinking about the logistics of doing this and what you could do is if a video is 60 minutes, you put 1 minute marker blocks on it where users can select a marker block that indicates the part they orgasmed on. That way you could have unified blocks or ranges that likely catch other users in that time range. If 1 minute isn't wide enough, maybe the block is 2 minutes. That way if 20 people mark it in that time frame, hopefully they should all be in that same range where the 20 flags at that range are more unified.

You could roll this feature out to maybe 100 users or whoever you have in your testing group. They then go through their favorite videos and add markers to the videos that they orgasmed to and which part.

If someone skims through 10-50+ scenes until they get to one that makes them orgasm, usually that one scene has that one angle or factor in it that helps them orgasm. If they could flag that time range in the scene where they orgasmed, like a 30 second range block is added or 1 minute block, etc. they can slide around and drop on the time bar, or select the block or it auto selects it based on where they are, I think this data would be very useful to users and to SLR.

A lot of VR porn can be very long which is great but also has the downside of nobody really has time to give them all a real chance. So most are skimming a lot of them and if you don't skim that one part that is really great, you might not see why others like it so much cause you missed that part.

This also will help for tracking of the best of the best scenes, the ones that actually cause users to orgasm and at what timestamp. It's something directors can use to reference for their angles to see what is most popular if someone clicks the same timestamp range. You could provide that data for searching and sorting. If the orgasm count is very high for a particular video, it would be more useful data than general favorites. Someone could have 500 favorites but only have orgasmed to maybe 20 of them for example so favorites aren't really that helpful for data but are better than nothing.

A more advanced use for this down the line could be orgasm playlists. Where it cycles through the catalogue of the scenes you watched in the past and plays the marked orgasm timestamps back to back.

You could also add special markers on videos that have over a certain number of confirmed orgasms at a certain point, you can add a marker for it with the special orgasm icon so when people see it they know where the best parts are based on user feedback.

Really there is no ultimate review than that. So it would indirectly be adding a review feature to videos where people are saying this scene is so good that I couldn't get through it without orgasming despite my urge to continue going through the massive catalogue and seeing what else there is.

To counter abuse of the system, maybe at first only official testers/reviewers marks show up. And when it's rolled out to the general user base, the markers only show up on the users account until it receives a certain number of combined marks for it to show up with a global marking or after admins review the marking to confirm they are likely legitimate and not abusing the system.

Just some thoughts.

    RoccoVR I've thought of something similar, but instead just allow the user to vote specific time hacks in a video up or down, regardless of when they cum. There may be parts of a video they love and other parts they hate. The software could log the time the vote up/down action occurred.

    This can give more accurate feedback. For the customer feedback branch of the company, they could then see heatmaps of areas in a video that have strong positive or negative responses.

    So, videos are too long/you want to see the best parts, and your suggestion is that users should help participate in pointing out the best parts by pointing out when they cum. I think this works only under the assumption that everyone wants the same thing (and that you always want the same thing). But neither is true, right? Some days people want missionary, reverse cowgirl, or blowjobs etc. I figure the timestamps and tags already solve this problem by letting you skip to what you want to see. Also, if your system was implemented, since people like different things at different times, I feel like the entire video would eventually get highlighted.

    I do like the idea of using cum markers to automatically create like a playlist of all your favorite parts though. It would basically be a compilation of your favorite parts that can be shuffled around. That would be great if they did that.

    If we could get the wankz/povr studios cropping and editing playlist gadget on here that be awesome. To have access to that style of video cropping and playlist editing with slr and on deo would be game changing. Especially if the scripts worked with it.

    A feature to 'shareable tag' each AB marker we put in the video. So one page will have the SLR descriptors of each major position of the scene and then a toggle menu button to show the user tags that have been shared. Things such as eye contact, orgasm/climax etc can be added and also ranked too. The watcher can then have a glorious listing and idea of what is in the scene without having to explore a ton to figure it out. Some of us love skipping around in the videos or are just in the mood for a particular thing on a certain day. This will help accomplish that.

    A heatmap graph below the video of what people vote up or down on the video parts would be pretty legendary and futuristic tech. The more upvotes on parts the more higher the graph or darker the color would be interesting.

    My thoughts are when I start streaming on SLR, I skim through a number of scenes and if something really stands out, I will favorite it. Just because someone favorites it, doesn't mean they orgasmed to it. It means it had something that they really liked and might be worth saving or downloading later so they just want to save the info on it. So if out of 25-50 videos, you only orgasm to 1 video, that means that 1 video is more than just a favorite, it's like the best of the best. So it's possible some video on here could have 5,000 favorites but another only has 200 but it it has more orgasms. It also means it's possible that a video could have 1,000+ favorites on it but have no orgasms on it. It's a hot video but nobody wants to orgasm to it because it's missing that factor so people keep streaming for something better but still like it.

    So if people then tune in to that part that seems to be causing all the orgasms, it might then cause it to have 5,000+ favorites as well on a video that maybe a lot of people are overlooking. It's more of a time thing, nobody has time to watch all videos from end to end and as the catalogue grows, better rating systems I think will need to be established as general favorites I don't think are the best way.

    Usually a better way is reviews from trusted reviewers who share similar tastes or who have recommended top stuff in the past. Orgasm scenes could be added as a user playlist and they could choose if they want to make it public or not. Then you have all those public and I think it would be be good data to narrow down what to watch.

    Overall it would be good for SLR in the long run as well because it would provide great data for content creation and also I think it would reduce streaming/download times as most time people spend looking for a good scene. This would help them find it faster based on user feedback. Of course user tastes would vary but that's why tracking the overall stack of orgasms on a particular video would average that out. If one has 200 orgasms on it from 2000 different users, most would want to know what scene that was and around what time this best part was.

    Also if you were to write reviews on VR scenes with 5 stars being the highest rating, chances are the scenes that you orgasm to would have the highest rating of a 4, 4.5, or 5 and anything that was just hot or a favorite to maybe check out again later might have a rating of 3.5-4.

    Orgasms is big part of the difference between a 4, 4.5, or 5 star rating. It's really the main criteria that a lot of reviewers base their porn reviews on. There are some people that seem to keep revisiting the same scenes because others don't do it for them so that data could be captured with an orgasm timestamp marker. It would be like giving users the chance to mark scenes as all-star scenes, or best of best scenes for rating/review purposes. It's probably the most important data to capture I think because a lot could be done with that data from content creation, to rankings, to interest tracking, etc.

    Also there was a recent post from an SLR admin asking for people's favorite angles and screenshots. This is data that could also be pulled from something like this. You could just go look at all the orgasm markers and what time stamps and angles were selected to clearly see what is working the best.

    blaze466

    For you it might seem random but if a computer was to analyze the data, I don't think it would be random. If it tracked the last 100 over time, it would likely find a pattern where they had certain angles or related factors. It would be similar to asking you what is it you don't like, you'd likely have a list. But if you ask what it is you like the most, what angles are your favorite, what pornstars have you orgasmed to the most, what are your favorite scenes, you say it's random. But really it might be that you just don't want to disclose it or take the time to list it all out because it's too personal or weird or you don't have time for all that. So it's easier to just say it's random and that you won't participate in it or use it. Until one day it's launched, and you go and see that the parts you keep orgasming to are showing up as markers that others are also marking. And you go and view and see a playlist of someone who has all the same markers as you. It's an orgasm AI bot that has been monitoring what the last scene is that you watched the most of before cutting off your device for the night. It monitored the time stamp you were last on or most likely to have orgasmed on. Suddenly you realize you didn't even have to mark them at all, AI has advanced to a point where it can do it for you now.

    I think it's only random because you think random exists but in reality, random is just you saying you don't know. The computer data could analyze it and show you over the last 500 orgasms, you had this trend that was most common. When it was shot with this particular position and you randomly came across it, you had a 80% higher chance of orgasming. A 90% chance of orgasming if you'd already been searching and browsing or warmed up for over 30 minutes. A 95%+ chance of orgasming if you'd already been searching and browsing or warmed up for over 1 hour.

    I agree with you that it doesn't mean it's better than the last, only because if you watch the best scene in the world right when you turn the device on, chances are you will almost orgasm which is another marker in itself, but you hold it back to keep viewing all the content and see what is new that you might be missing. But as more time progresses and you feel you've caught up and now know what you've missed since you last signed on, you likely are more likely to not hold back an orgasm and it then happens more "randomly" on the next thing that has what you like in it. That doesn't mean that data isn't still helpful, it's very useful for content developers, SLR, and other users who maybe don't have as much time to view content or comb through it as in detail as others with more time. Or maybe you have a lower time window to use it, are tired and want to be done with it, so you try to find something more quicker, so your "random" window is even lower. I don't think it's random though.

    The future isn't admins asking what your favorite positions and angles are or what scenes you orgasmed to and what time stamp, it's computer AI pulling that data and telling it to people who think it's random to show them that it's not.

    "What would I like to watch today Oculus, I have only an hour before bed because I have to work in the morning?" "Based on your recent tastes blaze466, I have created an SLR playlist for you of all new scenes that meet your criteria. Based on your user data you have never lasted more than 45 minutes viewing this data. Would you like to shorten the time span and compact it further?" "No Oculus, 45 minutes is the perfect amount of time. Please load up the playlist."

    This may come across as harsh and I honestly don’t mean it to, it’s a genuine question but why would anyone care at what point some other dude blew his load watching the video? Can’t say it’s ever been something that I’ve thought about when watching a scene.

      petermc

      Because that's how porn works. You watch it to orgasm, so if that is your goal, many are going to want to see what has been best at achieving that goal across a user base. Or you could use it for your own tracking purposes to keep up with what has worked best for you. It's really about perspective, you see it as knowing what other dudes orgasm to, I see it as which hot pornstar girls have made the most people orgasm and what were they doing.

      If you go write reviews for porn or read reviews, the reviews that score the highest are the ones that the reviewer orgasmed to or almost orgasmed to. It basically saves you from having to read reviews or sort through 5 star ratings. Right now the favorites system could be something someone would rank anywhere from 3.5 stars to 5 stars so it's very vague. Really it's just about providing more data for users who think it might be good data to sort by.

      It might be more useful data for SLR and content creators at first as some people may not think it's useful until they start to see there are trends in the data and it's not random.

      If you don't think it's good data to sort by, then you don't have to use it. But for me if I see something has 20,000 orgasms on it and it's going to tell me which part in the video has most of those orgasms, I'm going to click and I'm going to go see what that part is like. I think you're lieing if you're saying you wouldn't check and see or use it if it existed and had high tracking counts like that. And I'm pretty sure content creators would really want that data too because they could see the exact angle and setup that seems to have that winning formula. It's just about user data.

      Like someone else said, time spent on a video might be more useful in their opinion. I think that's something that could be added as well and users could sort by it to see if that data is helpful or not in narrowing down better scenes.

      The point really is how do you provide better data and resources to sort through 19k+ VR videos when one day it could be 100k. I think orgasm tracked timestamp markers would be futuristic tech that would be really useful.

      I wanted to add that when it comes to sorting porn, I usually will download videos but then the ones that make me orgasm or almost orgasm, I will put those in a favorites folder, so it's like the best of the best. That way if I am watching porn and nothing seems to be doing it for me, or if I really just want to orgasm fairly quickly and not spend hours watching porn, I will go back to my favorites folder and watch something that has got me to orgasm in the past. I think this is a common practice with porn viewers and isn't info most admit or share. This data could probably be tracked by video that a user most replays as well or goes back to most often. The point being is there is a lot of useful data that could be used to make sorting for the best of the best easier.

      2 years later

      Do we still want it?
      I'm checking with content team to start tagging it and maybe adding a quick button into the app

      LOL, I don't think this will generate any really useful results beyond realizing that people get off to weird shit or like to game systems like this for weird satisfaction. Guaranteed that at least one shot of Tadpole's butthole will be in the top 10.

      You may as well provide a ranking of last vids watched during people's sessions. There's a strong chance that those scenes are the ones that made them orgasm and would indicate basically the same as the OP's original premise except largely automated (doesn't require a complicated and likely gameable crowd function). I suppose you could even log timestamps on "finishing" scenes. Still gameable, but less so. Questionable personal data collection though--would likely need an opt-in button.