Question to all TS lovers on SLR

Lurks

Quite an interesting question you pose, and one I have no doubt a lot of men, and women for that matter have asked themselves. Without delving too far into the "does liking TS porn mean you're gay" side of the question, which I think can be quite confronting to those who would otherwise consider themselves 'straight' my personal viewing of TS porn runs along the lines of "this is a woman who just so happens to have a sexual organ that is a penis". Also in keeping with that traditional, penetrative sex, and particularly in porn, it's about the fucking. Anal sex and oral sex are the two options, and that can go both ways, though the focus is more on the male model penetrating the TS model.

I personally am not into traditional gay porn, however I quite enjoy viewing TS porn as long as certain criteria are met: she should be beautful, she should be obviously enjoying sex, she should be feminine, her dick should get hard when she gets turned on (though not a deal breaker), if she can ejaculate then that's a bonus (though again, not a deal breaker).

These are my own criteri and I am in no way suggesting that what I am saying should apply to anyone or everyone else - what turns you on turns you on. People can embrace or deny what turns them on but I prefer to explore the full depths of my kinks.

Lurks I like variety, so other than the typical vanilla, ebony, or JAV girls, ... TS girls offer other exotic choices of different ethnicities. To me, beauty and attraction is beauty and attraction regardless of if they have a dick or if they're alien-like. :

I never thought of it as gay sex because, in the case of SLR content, many legit look like real women. Even though they're technically not, I still enjoy them the same way I enjoy VR sex, while technically not real sex.

Anal is not something that turns me on, but TS girls are the exception. Seeing their plump asses on full display either bouncing up and down or being pounded from behind just gets me hard and makes me want to get in on the action.

It turns out the experience has a unique quality to it. Kind of hard to explain, but it's like the difference between falling in love with a girl and falling in love period. Being mentally and emotionally stimulated during the course of sex with women in VR is nice. But it's also nice just having raw sexual encounters with TS girls in VR, just for the sake of it.

abcrebel Who are you to say they their technically not a women?

Lurks .....Well if you are only talking about porn, what does it matter as it's about what gets you off. Now if you mean you want to meet a Trans girl in real life? I don't think you're mind is there if you're worrying about being or appearing gay. Either your attracted to her or your not, either the first date is amazing or it's not, you either fall madly in love, just fuck buddies or you don't. No different that any other woman, just has a little extra meaty clit if that helps. Also I would argue the opposite with the anal sex. I love men and women and have had some great dirty nasty sex over the years with some hot women, but I've only done anal with a couple times with women, I do not get other men's fascination with anal sex with women. Everyone has an anus, the vagina is unique to the gals, ya know. Plus a lot of them aren't really into it, and the few that actually are into it, rarely orgasm from it. I've never met a man or trans woman that's a bottom, doesn't love getting in the ass and then splooges all over the place from the experience.

SunnyRFF I'm a person sharing my thoughts Are you one to say that VR sex is technically not sex? Think about it ... it would be hypocritical if you would say they are not the same. I was just using a loose analogy for what's considered mass consensus; as you have stated yourself, "the vagina is unique to the gals, ya know." By that logic, transwomen are not women.

It's typical for human-kind to define in terms of biology, separating one gender from another, one reality from another, or one experience from another, when to me that's just a form of discrimination that people are brainwashed into believing. "Penis? It's a guy." "VR? Not real." That's what "they" say and I completely understand your questioning, but as a person sharing more of my thoughts, why stop there? Why do we define men and women by their genitals? Why do we define what's real by who or what can be touched and taking up physical space?

I try not to get caught up in these things, and rather see the common denominator because otherwise we have much of the conflict we have in the world today. We are not just black, white, or asian, but human beings with a range of unique ethnicities ... we are not just male or female but living-beings who possess a range of feminine and masculine energies ... that which we think is "real life" is just a limited, perceptual experience we are presently aware of. I'm grateful for trans women transcending boundaries, and I'm also grateful for all experiences outside of "real-life" making us question what really constitutes reality. Lucid dreams, out-of-body experiences, psychedelic experiences, virtual reality, augmented reality, all forms of extra-sensory perception ... to me, it's all real, including sex in each one ... who cares what "they" say.

Late reply but its a perfectly fine question to ask.

Its a spectrum, I think I personally find femininity sexually attractive as a catch all.

Doesn't matter what they've got going on downstairs, if there feminine i'm down for it.

For some its a bisexual thing and thats also totally fine.

I agree there's a bit too much of a focus on anal/bottoming in the trans vr content.

I'd love some more girls on top, and having her put her cock in my mouth and face.

I’m not sure trans women would like to be categorised as “a man who pretends to be a woman”.

In terms of sex though, there’s only one hole so it has to be anal.

I can get off to trans porn and I don’t consider it to be gay. However, if the performer looks really masculine, it does put me off. My personal preference is that they are pretty, that their dick gets hard and I want to see them cum in the scene, ideally whilst being fucked. Jade Venus is the number one for me right now as she hits all those criteria.

it would SEEM like fetish, gay/TS stuff is tailor-made for VR....giving some people a chance to experience something they might not ever get a chance to do. whether it's cumming on 100's of girls feet...throat fucking a chick... non-consent....cuck wife (nonC or not)....maybe sucking a dick?? REGARDLESS of what it is???? they are missing the fucking boat and shooting regular porn we have SEEN for 40 years....occasionally we get a mind-blowing (surprising 30 seconds) scene that is perfect for VR

just simple simple shit....30 seconds here and there making sure EVERYBODY gets a something out of the video. doesn't happen, unless it's luck

it would seem that THE TS stuff would want to appeal to the closet lurkers. there probably should be threads that people can say...this is a great scene. producers should make sure there are 4 or 5 of those 30seoonds of what people deem to be great and make sure they try and cater to them....plan it out.

I go back to the foot fetish crap....WHY the fuck would you have access to shooting hundreds of girls and never once show their FEET up close and STILL? I do scan each one for 2min...just to make sure they are keeping up with their stupidity

the same exact thing for TS stuff....HOW does a producer not show a TS cock up close for VR EFFECT? why even shoot the VR?