adinihsan not sure what you've based that on, could be true.
I think it was Haney's report on UploadVR, but could also be on RoadToVR, I've read it on either of those 2 sites.
But yeah, i agree of course, IF you have this headset for gaming, it could be interesting to buy the PT cams (when they come out) and then use it for porn. But I would never recommend this headset if porn is your nr 1 use case, a Quest 3 would be the best choice there if you're on a budget.
EDIT found it:
_"Considering the Frame’s 4.6MP (2,160 × 2,160) per-eye resolution, I was expecting an image that looked similar to Quest 3’s display, which is 4.5MP (2,064 × 2,208). But I was surprised that the first thing I noticed was a somewhat visible screen-door effect (SDE), which is caused by the unlit space between pixels.
Considering I haven’t (yet) been able to test Frame side-by-side with Quest 3, there’s two explanations for the somewhat apparent SDE. Either I’m completely spoiled by the high resolution displays of headsets like Vision Pro and Galaxy XR, or (more likely) Frame’s LCD has a lower fill-factor than Quest 3’s LCD, even though they have a very similar number of pixels and field-of-view_."
https://www.roadtovr.com/steam-frame-hands-on-valve-vr-headset-index-2/